Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 2008No. CR0301819, A134313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced him to 36 months’ probation, including the condition that he not possess illegal drugs or narcotics.

Defendant now appeals a probation violation judgment and order in which the trial court found defendant to be in violation of probation, continued probation, and imposed an additional condition prohibiting defendant from possessing marijuana, notwithstanding the fact that, by the time the trial court imposed that condition, defendant had obtained a medical marijuana card.

The state responds…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. DickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HauskinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Cyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. MorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API