Legal Opinion

State v. Larrance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 17, 1997No. 961804C3; CA A94469PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s imposition of restitution, claiming that the court failed to comply with the statutory requirements of ORS 137.106. We remand for resentencing on the issue of restitution.

Defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of arson in the first degree. ORS 164.325. During sentencing, defendant objected to the amount of restitution requested by the state, $80,623.91, arguing that defendant had a history of earning only minimum wage, was $13,000 in debt, and had no ability to pay. That is the extent of the record on the issue of restitution.

ORS 137.106 provides, in part:

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. EdsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KappelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API