Gregory v. Wendell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
Defendants in error are produce brokers and commission merchants in the city of Detroit, doing business under the copartnership name of J. H. Wendell & Co. Plaintiffs in error are dealers in produce, among other things, at Owosso, Michigan, under the firm name of Gregory & McHardy. In April, 1877, Gregory was at the office of Wendell & Co. in Detroit, and made an arrangement for the purchase by Wendell & Co. for them, of twenty thousand bushels of corn on the Chicago market, for delivery in June. In pursuance of this arrangement the firm of Cooley & McHenry, produce brokers in Chicago, were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
- Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Horton v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Pixley v. BoyntonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Cassard v. HinmanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. WeithoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Harvey v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Cole v. Brown-Hurley Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.