Legal Opinion

Hayday v. Hammermill Paper Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1929No. 26,762PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

After verdict for plaintiff in this.action for breach of a contract for the sale of pulpwood, defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Plaintiff is the assignee of Hughes Brothers Timber Company, a copartnership, hereinafter designated as the sellers. Under date of October 12, 1923, they entered into a written contract with defendant, sometimes herein referred to as the buyer, for the sale of 20,000 cords of pulpwood. As to quality the contract stipulated that the wood Avas to be 90 per cent or more spruce and 10 per cent or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Provident Savings Life Assurance Society v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Oakley v. GoodnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grassi v. Ciba-Geigy, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Grassi v. Ciba-Geigy, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Rosecrans v. William S. Lozier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. Blair v. EspelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT DER HARLANDER BUAMWOLLSPINNERIE UND ZWIRN-FABRIK v. Lawrence Walker Cotton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API