Legal Opinion

Provident Savings Life Assurance Society v. Ford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 4, 1885PublishedCited by 67 opinions

IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NEW YORK. This was a writ oí error to the Supreme Court of New York to review a judgment of that court denying a motion for a re-mo val of the cause to the Circuit Court of the United States. The facts which make the federal question are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bbadley

This was an action brought in the Supreme Court of New York by Daniel "W. Ford, the defendant in error, against the Provident Savings Life Assurance Company (the plaintiff in error) on a judgment recovered by one Charles Cochran against said company in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, and assigned by Cochran to the plaintiff, Ford. The complaint. contained, amongst others, the following aver-ments, to wit: “ That heretofore and on or about the 12th day of December, 1876, one Charles Cochran, then a resident of the State of Ohio, in due form of law,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Starin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. West Jersey Title & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Carson v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API