Legal Opinion · Dissent

Borab Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 19, 1944No. C. D. 825Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Tilson, Judge:

Because of my strong conviction that my associates have fallen into error in both their reasoning and conclusion in this *21case, I feel compelled to dissent therefrom. In view of the fairness with which the majority have detailed the testimony, no good purpose would be served by a reiteration of the same by me. I shall therefore refer only to such portions of the testimony as I feel require special emphasis.

As I understand the record, the method of producing the material of which the imported merchandise was made was in substance that a certain number of rather…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API