Legal Opinion

Doninelli Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeal, No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

■ This is an appeal by claimant from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. The Board held that he was ineligible for benefits under section 402 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended by the Act ,of May 23, 1949, P.L. 1738, 43 PS §802, which provides that an employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week in which his unemployment is due to voluntarily leaving work without- good cause.

Claimant was last employed as a wiper on a tanker operated by the Sinclair Refining Company. It was the policy of the employer to pass a so-called “quit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Sledzianowski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Elnit Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graves v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Sohler v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Novel Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Sohler v. DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SEC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API