Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
Plaintiff sought just compensation computed by the fair market value standard for the legislative taking of 16.05 acres of property. Defendant argued that plaintiff was entitled to nominal compensation only.
I. Facts
In 1986, Hazel-Peterson Companies purchased undeveloped property in Prince William County, Virginia. At the time of the acquisition, the property encompassed approximately 550 acres and was zoned A-l, Agricultural. This property, which became known as the William Center, is situated near Manassas and adjoins the Manassas Battlefield Park.
Following…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Kraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Board of County Supervisors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.