Board of County Supervisors v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, “to determine just compensation due the [plaintiff] for the taking of its land which it held in unencumbered fee simple.” Board of County Supervisors v. United States, 48 F.3d 520, 528 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 61, 133 L.Ed.2d 24 (1995).
FACTS
In 1986, Hazel-Peterson Companies (“the Developer”) purchased nearly 550 acres of agricultural land in Prince William County, Virginia. Because the land was zoned as “Agricultural,” development could…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Board of County Supervisors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000