Legal Opinion

Board of County Supervisors v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 24, 1996No. 90-364LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This case is before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, “to determine just compensation due the [plaintiff] for the taking of its land which it held in unencumbered fee simple.” Board of County Supervisors v. United States, 48 F.3d 520, 528 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 61, 133 L.Ed.2d 24 (1995).

FACTS

In 1986, Hazel-Peterson Companies (“the Developer”) purchased nearly 550 acres of agricultural land in Prince William County, Virginia. Because the land was zoned as “Agricultural,” development could…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Board of County Supervisors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County, Virginia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API