Legal Opinion

State v. Karas

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1913No. 2555PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Seventh District; Hon. A. H. Christensen, Judge. Gust Karas was convicted of third degree burglary. ' He ' appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStkaup, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary in the third degree — breaking into a tent in the daytime — and appeals.

1 The sufficiency of the evidence to show the commission of the offense is conceded. The question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to connect the defendant with it.

Near Schofield, some five tents in a row, numbered from twenty-one to twenty-five, and from ten to one hundred feet apart, were maintained and occupied by miners working in a mine near by. Tent twenty-five was burglarized. It was occupied by two miners, who, as they testified, at about seven o’clock…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HopkirkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  3. Commonwealth v. CharlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  5. Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BookerUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. JonasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. DerembeisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Connell v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. State v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API