Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1937No. 5643PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EPHRAIM HANSON, Justice.

The defendant was found guilty of rape and was sentenced to the state prison for a period of not less than five years. In the selection of the jury the trial court limited defendant to four peremptory challenges. Defendant there contended, and contends here, that he was entitled to ten peremptory challenges. Section 105-31-15, R. S. Utah 1933, provides that

“the defendant and the state shall each be entitled to peremptory challenges as follows: (1) If the offense charged is punishable with death or by imprisonment for life, to the number of ten. (2) If the offense…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. NorringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. State v. SquierNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Devoy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. State v. WardUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. NemierUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Padilla v. Utah Bd. of Pardons and ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API