Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Peter

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1945No. 6823Published

1DissentLarson, Chief Justice

I concur in affirming the judgment, but I vigorously dissent from that part of the opinion overruling Coburn v. Bartholomew, 50 Utah 566, 167 P. 1156; National Bank v. James Pingree Co., 62 Utah 259, 218 P. 552; United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Malia, Bank Com’r, 87 Utah 426, 49 P. 2d 954, holding that a pledge came within Sec. 104-55-1, U. C. A. 1943. The statute was so interpreted in 1917, and reiterated in. 1923 and in 1935. During that period the legislature has met fifteen times, and has reenacted the section without change after the interpretation placed upon it by this court. To…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Coburn v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bacon v. RaybouldUtah Supreme Court · 1886
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. James Pingree Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Everill v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API