Legal Opinion

Ruwitch v. Frankel

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 19, 1933No. 4981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.. Appellant, a citizen and resident of Michigan, filed her amended bill in equity on behalf of herself and all other bondholders of Straus Bros, and Straus Bros. Investment 'Company, hereinafter referred to as the Straus firm, against appellees who are all citizens and residents of Illinois, Louis P. Frankel and Gustav Frankel, as individuals and as partners doing business as Frankel Bros., also against Herman S. Strauss, Esbi-eo Management Corporation, Mohawk Finance Corporation, Straus Bros. Holding Corporation, and B. L. Rosset, C. J. Young, A. S. Grover, E. G.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Standard Stoker Co. v. LowerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
  3. Murphy v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. St. Louis v. Knapp CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Church v. SwetlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Eastern Viavi Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Wenzel & Henoch Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Water Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API