Legal Opinion
Standard Stoker Co. v. Lower
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 6, 1931No. 1771PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
The questions hero at issue arise upon three motions to dismiss the hill of complaint, a separate motion being filed by each of the three defendants, appearing specially for the purpose of these motions only. Complainant has also filed a motion to be allowed to bring one of the defendants, Ketchpel, within the jurisdiction of the court by substituted process, pursuant to the provisions of section 57 of the Judicial Code (28 IJSCA § 118).
A number of distinct questions of venue are presented by the three motions which will be hereinafter separately considered.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Myers v. American Dental Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Myers v. American Dental AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jeffrey Otherson, United States of America v. Bruce BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.