Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bole v. Lay

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1931No. 6,733PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

On August 15, 1929, relators filed application in the district court of Gallatin county for an alternative writ of mandamus directed against the defendants, commanding them to surrender to relators for inspection a certain complaint in a divorce action or to show cause why they should not do so. In general; the petition sets forth that relator Bole is president of the Chronicle Publishing Company, a corporation engaged in publishing a newspaper in Bozeman, Gallatin county, and that relator Walter Aitken is his attorney; that defendant Lay is the clerk of the district court of Gallatin county…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Montana Central Railway Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State Ex Rel. County of Musselshell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ringling v. BieringMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Stephens v. KeasterMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Pentz v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adamson v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re Blankenbaker's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State ex rel. Aho v. Justice CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Bole v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Walker v. Board of Com'rsMontana Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API