Legal Opinion

Pentz v. Corscadden

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1914No. 3,422PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bavalli County; B. Lee McCullough, Judge. Action by Percy Pentz against George Corscadden.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

Plaintiff in the court below has attempted to appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint and directing the [1] dismissal of his action. There was not any judgment entered but only a minute entry of the order. The order is not a judgment (Rev. Codes, secs. 6710, 7139; State ex rel. Allen v. Hawkins, 33 Mont. 177, 82 Pac. 952; Lisker v. O’Rourke, 28 Mont. 129, 72 Pac. 416, 755; Butte & B. C. M. Co. v. Montana Ore Fur. Co., 27 Mont. 152, 69 Pac. 714); neither is it one of the enumerated orders from which an appeal can be taken (sec. 7098, Rev. Codes), and therefore this court is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lisker v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Allen v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prentice Lumber Co. v. HukillMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. County of Musselshell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Payne v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Heater v. Boston & Montana Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Rambur v. DIEHL LUMBER COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API