Sagarin v. City of Bloomington
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellants-Plaintiffs Jeff Sagarin and Shirley Jablonski appeal the trial court's order regarding their claims for inverse condemnation and taking without just compensation against Appellee-Defendant the City of Bloomington ("the City"). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Issues
On appeal, the parties raise numerous issues. We consolidate and revise the issues raised by the Appellants to the following:
I. Whether the trial court erred by finding in favor of the City as to Sagarin's claims;
II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Biddle v. BAA Indianapolis, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Meisenhelder v. Zipp Express, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Raymond Kerr v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Michael Patrick Knott and Andrew John Knott v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- McAllister v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Daniel Enterprises, L.P. v. City of Portage, Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.