Legal Opinion

Funk v. First Nat. Bank of Miami, Okla.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1939No. 28996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

The First National Bank of Miami, as plaintiff, brought this action to quiet title to certain land in Craig county. In this suit plaintiff in error Funk intervened. The issues raised by the intervening petition, plaintiff’s answer and cross-petition thereto, and intervener’s reply, were tried by the court, who denied intervener’s demand for a jury, and judgment was rendered for plaintiff, from which intervener appeals.

1. Intervener urges five specifications of error, the first three of which may be disposed of together. All go to the validity of a judgment obtained by plaintiff against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Maynard v. HusteadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Wilson v. BombeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Starr v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farris v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Harlan v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API