Legal Opinion

Matje v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1973No. Appeal, No. 27 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is an appeal from an Order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which denied benefits to a partially disabled Philadelphia policeman (Claimant). We are unable to resolve the question of the reasonableness of Claimant’s refusal to undergo recommended medical treatment and of the availability of compatible secondary employment under Philadelphia’s Eule 32 program which are at issue in this appeal, and must remand because a portion of the testimony, of the City’s medical witness, Doctor Eaymond Stein, was apparently misplaced by the Board. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. PATTERSON v. LENARTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Del Penn Steel Corp. v. AbramsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robachinski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Kistler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Byrd v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Marshall v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API