Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 16, 1983No. Appeals, Nos. 37 C.D. 1982 and 210 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
John E. Marshall (claimant) appeals here an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s order to set off the pension benefits received by the claimant as credits applied against the compensation payable. Appeal No. 37 C.D. 1982. McIntosh and Hemphill (employer) also appeal here the order of the Board which affirmed the referee’s order not to dismiss this claim as being untimely filed. Appeal No. 210 C.D. 1982. (The cases were consolidated for argument.)
On October 23, 1969, the claimant was injured in the course of his employment.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Hill v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hildebrand v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Allegheny Ludlum, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- John Curry, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986