Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Malinowski v. Hordis Bros.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1997No. 95-451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The commission determined that claimant was physically capable of sedentary work. It based its conclusion on reports from Drs. Matrka and Brown. The court of appeals, however, ruled that those reports were not “some evidence” supporting a sedentary-work capability. We affirm that judgment.

Dr. Matrka opined that claimant could do sedentary work if (1) he successfully completed rehabilitation and (2) he underwent the treatment program recommended by Dr. Leak. Unfortunately, the commission’s unexplained delay in responding to claimant’s treatment authorization request delayed claimant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poneris v. M J Painting Co., Unpublished Decision (5-1-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Moore v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (10-21-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Malinowski v. Hordis Bros., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API