State ex rel. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
While claimant’s nonmedical factors are mentioned, the commission’s decision clearly rests on Dr. Knight’s report. OCF alleges multiple defects in the report — either alone or in tandem with Knight’s deposition — which OCF claims negates the document’s evidentiary value.
Among other allegations, OCF asserts that Knight retracted any opinion as to permanent total impairment in a subsequent deposition. OCF bases this allegation on the following exchange:
“Q. [OCF] Are you aware of Deloris Wolfe’s current medical treatment requirements?
“A. [Doctor] No.
“Q. Do you know what medication she is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. First National Supermarkets, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Malinowski v. Hordis Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Frabott v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (6-30-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.