Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1994No. 93-1045PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

While claimant’s nonmedical factors are mentioned, the commission’s decision clearly rests on Dr. Knight’s report. OCF alleges multiple defects in the report — either alone or in tandem with Knight’s deposition — which OCF claims negates the document’s evidentiary value.

Among other allegations, OCF asserts that Knight retracted any opinion as to permanent total impairment in a subsequent deposition. OCF bases this allegation on the following exchange:

“Q. [OCF] Are you aware of Deloris Wolfe’s current medical treatment requirements?
“A. [Doctor] No.
“Q. Do you know what medication she is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. First National Supermarkets, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Malinowski v. Hordis Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Frabott v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (6-30-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API