Legal Opinion

State ex rel. PIA Psychiatric Hospitals, Inc. v. Ohio Certificate of Need Review Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1991No. Nos. 90-605 and 90-777PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of mandamus to issue, PIA N.E. and PIA Columbus must show that they are entitled to the CON Review Board’s performance of a clear legal duty and that they have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, 40 O.O. 2d 141, 228 N.E. 2d 631, paragraph ten of the syllabus. Therefore, our review must concentrate on two fundamental questions: (1) Does R.C. 3702.58(A), as it existed when the instant applications were filed, apply to the board’s review of applications filed pursuant to Section 12 of Am. Sub.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Blausey v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Starner v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Land O'Sun Realty Ltd. v. REWJB Gas InvestmentsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Land O'Sun Realty Ltd. v. REWJB Gas InvestmentsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API