Legal Opinion

Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2014No. 2013-0103PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal concerns the continued viability of payday lending in Ohio and raises questions regarding how payday loans fit within Ohio’s current statutory lending framework.

*537 Introduction

{¶2} Payday loans are typically small, unsecured, short-term loans, often repayable on the borrower’s next payday. Ohio Legislative Service Commission, Payday Lending in Ohio, Members Only Brief, Vol. 130, Issue 1 (Jan. 23, 2013), at 1, http://www.lsc.state.oh.us/membersonly/130paydaylending.pdf (accessed June 3, 2014) (“Payday Lending"). The borrower generally writes the lender a check for the full loan…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. State v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. New Riegel Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Buehrer Group Architecture & Eng., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Buddenberg v. Weisdack (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Stolz v. J & B Steel Erectors, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Hamer v. Danbury Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API