Standard Oil Co. v. Lachenmyer
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz
Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that the two defendants, Russell and Carrall Lachenmyer, were liable for goods delivered to them under the Illinois Family Expense doctrine. A 3-paragraph complaint, differing from the one filed, was served on the Lachenmyers (the only defendants involved in this appeal). It makes no mention of the Family Expense statute and alleges only that the defendants owed plaintiff for goods delivered, with no further detail as to the nature of the claim. While it appeal's that defendant Burke is the one who purchased the goods, there is no allegation in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kobus v. Formfit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Oberg v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Giova v. CarrolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wooding v. L & J PRESS CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Cuthbert v. StempinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Hill v. Lutheran HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Dangeles v. MarcusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Beals v. HuffmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.