Legal Opinion

Kobus v. Formfit Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1966No. 39270PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hershey

Plaintiff, Bruno Kobus, filed an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly occasioned by a wilful violation of the Illinois Structural Work Act (111. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap. 48, pars. 60-69), commonly referred to as the Scaffold Act. The complaint joined as defendant The Formfit Company, owner of the premises where the construction and the alleged injuries occurred, C. W. Johnson, a heating contractor, and Roberts-Lang-Gray, Inc., a mason contractor. Summary judgments were entered for all defendants. Appeal was taken as to the owner of the premises only. The Appellate Court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larson v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kobus v. Formfit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Davis v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Allison v. Shell Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API