Oberg v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
Appeal is taken from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Insurance Company, denying a claim for $1,569 in major medical expenses.
The controlling issue is whether the Company can forfeit the contract for failure to include in the application for insurance certain prior medical history which was within the knowledge of the insurer’s agent.
The complaint was filed within two years from the date of issuance so that the general incontestability clause did not become an issue. However, the Company alleged, as a separate defense, that the application which was attached to the policy contained…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. PothsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Moscov v. Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Pioneer Ins. Co. v. Alliance Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Royal Neighbors of America v. BomanIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Western & Southern Life Insurance v. TomasunIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leola Blair v. The Prudential Insurance Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Logan v. Allstate Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Standard Oil Co. v. LachenmyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Tesluk v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Boyles v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.