Legal Opinion

Witt v. Borough of Maywood

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 10, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

746 A.2d 25 (2000)

328 N.J. Super. 343

Dennis WITT and Lynn Witt, individually and as members of Maywood Property Owners Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BOROUGH OF MAYWOOD, Defendant-Respondent, and

Commerce Bank, Defendant/Intervenor-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 25, 2000.

Decided February 10, 2000.

Segreto & Segreto, Haledon, for plaintiffs-appellants (James V. Segreto, of counsel and on the brief).

Rupp & Ten Hoeve, Hackensack, for defendant-respondent Borough of Maywood (William F. Rupp, on the brief).

DeCotiis, FitzPatrick & Gluck, Teaneck,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Reorganization of Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Witt v. Borough of MaywoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Reorganization of Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Infinity Broadcasting v. NJ MEADOWLANDSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Deegan v. Perth Amboy Redevelopment AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Dock St. Seafood, Inc. v. City of WildwoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  5. BERGEN RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. VS. TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN PLANNING BOARD (L-1791-14, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API