Legal Opinion

Deegan v. Perth Amboy Redevelopment Agency

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 6, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

In 1997, the governing body of the City of Perth Amboy determined that a substantial portion of the City, including large tracts of industrially zoned property and portions of the downtown area, were in need of redevelopment pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 to -49. The governing body adopted a redevelopment plan for revitalization of this area and established the Perth Amboy Redevelopment Agency (PARA) to implement the plan.

By a resolution adopted on May 28, 2002, PARA approved an agreement with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. In Re the Request for Solid Waste Utility Customer ListsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Dolan v. DeCapuaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Willoughby v. Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Baghdikian v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of RamseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Besler v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF W. WINDSORSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. Besler v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. DOBCO, INC. VS. BERGEN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY HOSSAM IBRAHIM VS. BERGEN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY (L-0486-21 and L-0508-21, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API