Legal Opinion

Infinity Broadcasting v. NJ MEADOWLANDS

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 5, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

872 A.2d 125 (2005)

377 N.J. Super. 209

INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION and Inner City Broadcasting Corporation, Appellants,

v.

NEW JERSEY MEADOWLANDS COMMISSION, Respondent, and

Encap Golf Holdings, LLC, Intervenor/Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 5, 2004.

Decided May 5, 2005.

Kenneth D. McPherson, Jr., Secaucus, argued the cause for appellants (Waters, McPherson, McNeill, attorneys; Mr. McPherson, of counsel; Eric D. McCullough and Joseph W. Grather, Morristown, on the brief).

Valerie W. Haynes, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. In Re Application of Howard Savings Institution of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. NJ Dept. of Corr.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  2. Infinity Broadcasting Corp. v. New Jersey Meadowlands CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. Padna v. City C'cil of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  4. PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PATERSON VS. THEODORE LEVINE (L-1338-18, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API