Ponds v. State Ex Rel. Eyman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
This is an appeal from a Pinal County superior court order denying appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner challenged the validity of his conviction and sentence claiming that he was convicted “upon a charge not made in the information” and that his sentence was illegal.
The appellant was found guilty of the crime of forgery (attempt to pass). The information charged that the defendant:
“ * * * with intent to defraud, did attempt to pass as true and genuine to Francis Miller a certain forged instrument * * * all in violation of Section 13-421, A.R.S.”
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Charles Blair v. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Montgomery v. EymanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TresizeArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- State v. EscalanteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State v. JantzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976