Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Eyman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1964No. 8060PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

Appellant sought habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Pinal County, alleging that his sentence to the state prison at Florence was in excess of that permitted by law and was therefore void. The lower court refused to issue the writ and this appeal was subsequently filed.

An earlier application, made originally "to this court was denied, See Montgomery 'v. Eyman, No. 7907, April 16, 1963, but the record does not show the ground for denial. Because it might have been for the reason that such proceedings should originate at •the Superior Court level, we consider the merits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CorveloArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. JaniecSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. State v. JaniecNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Orme v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smalley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. McGriffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Watson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. Court of Appeals, Division IArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. State v. WilliamsonArizona Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API