State v. Escalante
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREER, Presiding Judge.
The central issue presented for our determination is whether A.R.S. § 13-3406(B)(2) effectively eliminates probation as a sentencing alternative if the defendant has been convicted of a prior felony offense even though the prior offense has not been alleged by the state. We hold that probation is available under the statute unless a prior offense has been alleged by the state, and dispose of the remaining issues raised by appellant accordingly.
I. FACTS
In a three-count indictment filed August 14, 1984, appellant was charged with the possession of marijuana for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. TresizeArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WaggonerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. PyeattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vittitoe v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986