Legal Opinion

Klundt v. Hemenway

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1932No. File No. 7270PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff, a creditor of defendant Herbert Hemenway, for the purpose of setting aside a transfer of realty from the said Herbert Hemenway to his son and codefendant Fred Hemenwa)', upon the ground that the same was fraudulent as to creditors and particularly as to plaintiff. Findings and conclusions were in favor of the defendants, and from judgment entered thereon and from denial of his motion for new trial plaintiff has appealed.

As one of his grounds for new trial, appellant 'by apt claim of error and upon proper record urged in the court below, and urges here,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Mace v. O'ReilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Connolly v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Western Building Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mellema v. MellemaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lagrange Construction, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hutchinson County v. BenderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Steffen v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API