Legal Opinion
Murray v. City of Tahlequah
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 6, 2002No. 01-7074PublishedCited by 243 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Pro Se Plaintiff Curtis L. Murray appeals a district court order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendants City of Tahlequah and Cherokee County Board of Commissioners filed separate summary judgment motions. After Murray failed to file a timely response to either motion, the district court granted the motions pursuant to Eastern District of Oklahoma Local Rule 7.1(B). Local Rule 7.1(B) provides that failure to file a response within fifteen days “will constitute a waiver of any objection by the noncomplying party, and ... will…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kevin K. Ogden v. San Juan County, Farmington Police Department, Aztec Detention Center, State of New Mexico, and Las Vegas Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Reed v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Hunt v. Steffensen (In re Steffensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2015
- Gamez v. Country Cottage Care & Rehab.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Harp v. Department of Human Services, Colorado Mental Health InstituteDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- In Re BrensingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Hunt v. Steffensen (In re Steffensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2014
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.