Legal Opinion

In Re Brensing

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 24, 2006No. 19-10210PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

ROBERT D. BERGER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 30) regarding the debtors’ objection to the proof of claim filed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). The debtors have responded to the motion (Doc. # 40).

Summary Judgment Standards

Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs summary judgment and is made applicable to adversary proceedings by Rule 7056 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. In articulating the standard of review for summary judgment motions, Rule 56 provides…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Murray v. City of TahlequahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,399 in the Matter of June M. Heath, Debtor. Joseph M. Black, Trustee v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. HarcharDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  2. In Re KnudsenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
  3. In Re WhallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  4. In Re DawesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  5. In re RamseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API