Legal Opinion

In Re Zink

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 31, 2009No. SC 89623PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“OCDC”), the disciplinary hearing panel, ■Brian E. Zink, and this Court all agree that Zink’s conduct through the course of his representation of Mary Hart and the subsequent federal investigation constitute misconduct and that he should be subject to discipline. After a hearing, the disciplinary panel recommended a retroactive suspension to coincide with a deferred prosecution agreement that Zink indepen dently reached with the United States attorney’s office. This Court rejects that recommendation and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re BelzSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. In Re Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. In Re LimSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. In re ForckSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. In Re: R. Scott GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  4. In re: Sanford P. KrigelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. In re: Ambry Nichole Schuessler, consolidated with In re: Katherine Anne DierdorfSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API