Legal Opinion

Woods v. Knickerbocker

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1949No. 12487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The Housing Expediter proceeded against H. D. Knickerbocker and his sons Bruce R. Knickerbocker and R. C. Knickerbocker in respect to overcharges of rent on twenty-eight housing units subject to rent control, asking an injunction against future violations of the applicable Acts and Regulations, a restoration to the tenants of the overcharges, and a recovery of three times the overcharges collected since one year before the filing of the suit less the overcharges restored for that period; the tenants not having sued therefor.

Several days before the hearing the parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bowles v. HastingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Porter v. MauleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  4. McCoy v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  5. East v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feinberg v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Woods v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API