Legal Opinion

Van Straaten Havey v. Foremost Silk

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 9, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is before the court on a petition to review the disallowance of a claim made by 500 Fifth Avenue, Inc., against the receiver of Foremost Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. Out of this same insolvency proceeding arose the case of G. Lee Havey,Receiver, c., v. Alfred Hofman et al., 121 N.J. Eq. 523;affirmed, 123 N.J. Eq. 589, 590.

The hosiery mills was a tenant of the creditor under a lease, with the rent reserved at the rate of $2,400 a year. The receiver surrendered the premises and has paid for his use and occupation up to the time of such surrender. The sole question before the court is as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Block v. Bell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  2. Havey v. HofmannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  3. Stockton v. Mechanics & Laborers Savings BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schlussel v. Emmanuel Roth Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Wendt v. Bergen Savings BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API