Legal Opinion
Wendt v. Bergen Savings Bank
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided April 13, 1942No. Docket 139/328PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants move to strike the bill for various reasons, all of which, summarized, are: That the suit is a claim for debt, or specified money damages arising out of a breach of contract, for which there is an adequate remedy at law; that the complainant has been guilty of laches; that the bill shows that the complainant accepted a new contract of tenancy and repudiated the contract upon which this suit is based.
The bill shows that the complainant and her husband (now deceased) on or about October 1st, 1928, executed a twenty-year lease for the premises, 80 Cottage Street, Jersey City, New…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hall v. OttersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1894
- Hinners v. BanvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Passaic National Bank, C., Co. v. EelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Otterson v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
- Sawtelle v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Enfield v. FWL, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991