Legal Opinion

Jones & Laughlins (Ltd.) v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 18, 1907No. 11812PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The Reporters'1 statement of the case: The facts of these cases will be found in Armstrong's Case (29 C. Cls. B., 148) and in the opinion in the present case.

1Opinion of the CourtTIowey, J.

Eleven different interests are here united in one petition-to obtain reports under the fourteenth section of the act of March 3, 1887. (24 Stat. L., 505.) Some sue in their own right; some as surviving partners; some as executors of a surviving partner; another sues as assignee in bankruptcy, and another as a corporation. Thus, some of the petitioners claim in their own personal right, some as the legal successor of the personal right, and others as the legal representative of the person, firm, or corporation alleged to be original sufferers.

The bill referred provides for payments to certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1894
  3. Peysert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1919
  2. Federal Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  3. Hooper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1918
  4. Brandon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911
  5. Laughlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API