Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case:
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice
The court having been directed by order of the Supreme Court to make findings of fact relative to some matters not included in the findings heretofore made upon which the court’s decision was based, additional findings have been made.
The rules of the court, as well as orderly procedure, are so frequently overlooked or ignored by parties that we take occasion to quote the rules, and because of the reasons assigned for the motion to remand this case the court feels justified in making a statement from the record of its course through this court. Assuming the importance, materiality, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roche v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1883
- McClure v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Jones & Laughlins (Ltd.) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coastal Environmental Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- BLR Group of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Lopez-Velazquez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- B&B Medical Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.