Legal Opinion

Peysert v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 12, 1906No. 18115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The Reporters’’ statement of the case: The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowry, J.

There is a separate cause of action in each of the nineteen hundred plaintiffs whose names appear in the petition or in the legal representatives of such of them as are dead. The misjoinder of persons whose demands, taken together, make an aggregate of something over two and one-half millions of dollars is apparent from the petition when we consider that the amounts are based on separate demands having no direct relation to the rights of the others; that they are for different sums which originally accrued at different dates and in different post-offices throughout the country, if they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clifton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. United States v. BufordSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. United States v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Brainard v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. United States v. CorwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Jones & Laughlins (Ltd.) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1907
  3. Luff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API