Legal Opinion

Pickell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1991No. 89-2805-L-1; CA A67095PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendant Oregon Mutual Insurance Company (OMIC). The trial court held that defendant correctly refused tender of an action against plaintiff, its insured. We affirm.

Plaintiff had retired from the construction business. He owned and managed some rental properties. He also served on the board of directors of Jefferson State Communications (JSC), an Oregon corporation that operated as a long-distance resale company. He served on the board primarily to protect his investment. Between 1982 and 1984, he persuaded various investors to put money into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. Northwest Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Oregon Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Von Lubken v. Hood River CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. AsheCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spring Vegetable Co. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API