Legal Opinion
Schreiber v. City of Rye
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerald Nolan, J.
This proceeding pursuant to article 78 CPLR has been somewhat complicated by the procedure adopted by the parties. The petition, which was not accompanied by affidavits or other written proof, alleges that the petitioner is a resident of the City of Yonkers, that the City of Eye maintains the Municipal Eye Golf Course and Swimming Pool, in the city, and that the said facilities were acquired and are maintained and operated with public funds. It is further alleged that on September 27, 1966 the petitioner made application for the necessary permit to entitle him to use the facilities of the Eye…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Campbell v. Town of HamburgNew York Supreme Court · 1935
- Hicks Development Corp. v. Incorporated Village of LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- People v. GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gewirtz v. City of Long BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Van Ness v. Borough of DealNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- AFA Protective Systems, Inc. v. CrouchleyNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1976