Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Town of Hamburg
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.
This action is brought for declaratory and injunctive relief to interpret certain clauses of a deed and to restrain defendants from violating the same. The property included in the deed is located within the boundaries of the defendant town of Hamburg, between the shore of Lake Erie and the main highway leading west from the city of Buffalo. The town of Hamburg is adjacent to and the premises are situated near the said city.
*135Although the instrument of conveyance contains a method of compulsory reversion no relief is sought under that provision of the deed. Upon the trial it Was indicated that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Stewart v. . TurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Village of Riverside v. MacLainIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Wheeler v. . SpinolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Towle v. . RemsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gewirtz v. City of Long BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Nelson v. DelongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- City of Fort Worth v. BurnettTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Rivet v. BurdickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- City of Fort Worth v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.