Legal Opinion

AFA Protective Systems, Inc. v. Crouchley

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

Petitioner, which is engaged in the business of providing protective services, including fire department connected fire alarm systems, applied to respondent for permission either to use a line in the existing registry at the Westbury fire house or ,to install its own registry. Its request was denied on the ground that ‘ ‘ there are no lines available * * * and lack of space precludes the installation of any additional signalling equipment”. In this article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks judgment requiring the district to make the requested connection, contending that (1) the Commissioners…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . GutberlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Matter of Application of Union Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. In re FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Hooker v. ConteNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McGraw Electric Co. v. LockyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Cyanamid Co. v. Power Conversion, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Van Dussen-Storto Motor Inn, Inc. v. Rochester Telephone Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. International Service Agencies v. O'SheaNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992
  5. Professional Ambulance Service, Inc. v. AbramowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API