Cummings v. Meskill

*1177MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON INTERVENING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION SEEKING INTERIM ORDER

In this legislative reapportionment case this court, 341 F.Supp. 139, found a plan adopted by a state board (sometimes referred to as the Saden plan) unconstitutional because of population deviations between districts. We appointed a master to draw a constitutionally acceptable plan. On appeal to the United States Supreme Court, 407 U.S. 902, 92 S.Ct. 2441, 32 L.Ed.2d 679 this court’s judgment was stayed. This court declined to correct population omissions and other errors in the Saden plan, corrections which would…