Howell v. Scroll Technologies
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
Molly Maurine Howell appeals the decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission denying her benefits for claimed occupational disease. Ms. Howell argues that there is no substantial basis to support the denial of benefits. We agree and reverse for the award of benefits.
Ms. Howell began working for Scroll Technologies on September 30, 1996. She was forty-seven years old at the time, had never smoked, was in generally good health, and had never been hospitalized. Ms. Howell worked ten-hour shifts four days a week, operating three machines on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- J.T. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Cloverleaf Express v. FoutsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Lee v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Cossey v. Pepsi Beverage Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Kiswire Pine Bluff, Inc. v. SegarsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.