Legal Opinion

Flamm v. Van Nierop

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1968PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. Dillon, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the first two causes of action alleged in the complaint for insufficiency in law. It is alleged in the first cause of action that on numerous occasions since' October, 1966, the defendant has done the following: Dashed at the plaintiff in a threatening manner in various public places, with ‘ ‘ threatening gestures, grimaces, leers, distorted faces and malign looks,” accompanied by “ ridiculous utterances and laughs ’ ’; driven his automobile behind that of the plaintiff at a dangerously close distance; walked closely behind, or beside, or in front of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pearson v. . PearsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Pauling v. National Review, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Brown v. YaspanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Stuto v. FleishmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Bender v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Stuto v. FleishmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Bender v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API